a time to remember
Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010How is it, that we learn things, yet so easily forget? How is it that something becomes a part of us, how we think, how we grow, what we believe, what we feel, how we live. . . and yet, we forget? Does it happen at the point of some trauma, that we throw out all of that which has gone before? Or is it simply carelessness, the dropping of our manifesto into the crowds and busyness of daily life?
And am I just assuming that it happens to more than just myself? Is this collective “we” accurate, or is it just me who is the forgetful one?
Recently I saw that an old friend had posted a quote, something written by Rilke, and something in me leaped. “You know Rilke!” I said to him, excited to find that my old friend shared some kind of sensibility of mine.
“Yes,” he replied, “You were the one who introduced me to him.”
Oh. I had forgotten. So many years ago. How could I have forgotten? There was a time when I was practically evangelistic about the German language poet/author. I carried a pocket sized copy of Letters to a Young Poet with me everywhere like a tract or a Bible for several years. I discovered his Letters first (where anyone should start with Rilke) and reading them felt like the first time anyone had ever truly understood me. For the first time, someone was telling me what to do, how to live, in a way that seemed strangely comforting, helpful and relevant. (Does it reflect badly on me that that was something I felt that I could gain from a dead Bohemian poet and not from the Church or from my own parents?)
I moved on from his Letters to his other (dense, but beautiful) prose, then his poetry (both certainly a development in the relationship), and even though I have to admit to struggling through the density of reading German in English translation (and in various levels of success of the translations), for the first time I felt that I had encountered another human being who felt things quite like I did, as strongly, as intensely, a bit of an alien in this world, and who struggled through his life because of it.
It felt like being understood.
The encouragement, was that he always said that life was worth it. Difficulties, and particularly the difficulty of solitude (which at the time I felt that I knew so well), were to be sought out instead of avoided. There was something I could accept in that. I heard him say:
“It is good to be solitary, for solitude is difficult; that something is difficult must be a reason the more for us to do it.”
and I took comfort. I was told:
“The purpose of life is to be defeated by greater and greater things”
and I believed him enough to get onto an airplane and leave my country and look for life. In all that confused me about my life I heard:
“Be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves. Do not now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them. And the point is to live everything. Live the questions”
and I no longer cared for security. In those days, I lived, I mean I really lived. Because someone who felt and failed and hurt like I did told me that it was still worth it.
Any easiness in life was worth risking, for the attempt at something better. Life was worth living at all, because of its wealth and intensity. But I’ve forgotten. My fear and pains smothered that hope and joy, my failures crawled on top of me and wrenched the manifesto out of my hands.
Like Leonard said, “We’ve got to remind them how good it is.” Wouldn’t it be nice, to try to remember again? Difficult. . . but perhaps worth it.
![]()
